Legal Opinion

Committee of Protesting Citizens v. Val Vue Sewer District

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided February 10, 1976No. 3329-43096-1PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Callow, J.—

Quaere: Is the real estate contract vendor, the contract vendee, or both, owner of land entitled to protest the formation of a utility local improvement district under RCW 56.20.0302

We hold that when a real estate contract is of record in the office of the county auditor, only the vendees under the contract are “owners” entitled to protest the formation of a local improvement district under the statute.

On May 7, 1973, the commissioners of the Val Vue Sewer District adopted a resolution declaring their intention to create Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) No. 5 for the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
  2. Hartman v. Washington State Game CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Harder Et Ux. v. City of SpringfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1951
  5. Evans-Lee Co. v. HotonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. English Cove Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  2. Roberts v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
  3. State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. English Cove Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
  4. Mason v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of West RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API