Committee of Protesting Citizens v. Val Vue Sewer District
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Opinion of the Court
Callow, J.—
Quaere: Is the real estate contract vendor, the contract vendee, or both, owner of land entitled to protest the formation of a utility local improvement district under RCW 56.20.0302
We hold that when a real estate contract is of record in the office of the county auditor, only the vendees under the contract are “owners” entitled to protest the formation of a local improvement district under the statute.
On May 7, 1973, the commissioners of the Val Vue Sewer District adopted a resolution declaring their intention to create Utility Local Improvement District (ULID) No. 5 for the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sorenson v. City of BellinghamWashington Supreme Court · 1972
- Hartman v. Washington State Game CommissionWashington Supreme Court · 1975
- Ashford v. ReeseWashington Supreme Court · 1925
- Harder Et Ux. v. City of SpringfieldOregon Supreme Court · 1951
- Evans-Lee Co. v. HotonWisconsin Supreme Court · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. English Cove Associates, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Roberts v. OsburnCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1979
- State Farm Fire & Cas. Co. v. English Cove Ass'n, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2004
- Mason v. RosewellAppellate Court of Illinois · 1982
- First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of West RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.