Bronnenkant v. Kucera
Nebraska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtSimmons, C. J.
In this action plaintiff seeks to recover damages for malicious prosecution as a result of his having been committed *409to the state hospital as insane. At the conclusion of plaintiff’s case in chief, the defendants each moved for a directed verdict. The trial court sustained the motions. Plaintiff filed a motion for a new trial which was overruled. He ap-' peals to this court assigning as error the directing of the verdict and the overruling of the motion for a new trial.
During the consideration of the motions for a directed verdict, the trial court stated that, from the opening statements and…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Bechel v. Pacific Express Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1902
- Kersenbrock v. Security State BankNebraska Supreme Court · 1931
- Clausen v. Omaha Loan & Building Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1936
- Kimball v. Lincoln Theatre Corp.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1935
- McHugh v. RidgellNebraska Supreme Court · 1920
3Cited by7 opinions
- Twenty Club v. State, Department of Roads & IrrigationNebraska Supreme Court · 1958
- Brumbaugh v. Frontier Refining Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1962
- Brewer v. FischerNebraska Supreme Court · 1944
- Rose v. ReinhartNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- Jones v. BrockmanNebraska Supreme Court · 1973
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.