Legal Opinion

State v. 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee Automobile, VIN: 1J4GZ78Y5WC143664

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided January 14, 2016No. 20150270PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McEVERS, Justice.

[¶ 1] Mark Matuska, registered owner of a 1998 Jeep Grand Cherokee, appeals from a district court’s amended judgment in a civil forfeiture action. Matuska argues the district court abused its discretion in amending the judgment. Additionally, he argues N.D.C.C. § 19-03.1-36(l)(e) does not authorize the forfeiture of the contents of the vehicle or the $618. We vacate the amended judgment and dismiss the remainder of the appeal as barred by res judicata.

I

[¶ 2] According to the. district court filings, Matuska was arrested during a controlled narcotics buy. The State filed a…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Hofsommer v. Hofsommer Excavating, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1992
  2. United States v. Mary StuartCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1968
  3. Gruebele v. GruebeleNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Jack W. Kelley v. Bank Building and Equipment Corporation of America, a Corporation, and Advance Glass Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1972
  5. Schnell v. SchnellNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1977

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State ex rel. City of Marion v. AlberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Erickson v. OlsenNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2016
  3. State ex rel. City of Marion v. AlberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  4. State ex rel. City of Marion v. AlberNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2018
  5. Tischmak v. TheurerNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API