Legal Opinion

United States v. Corps

U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review

Decided July 10, 1991No. NMCM No. 891289PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ALBERTSON, Senior Judge:

On consideration of Appellant’s Motion to Compel Government Funded Psychosocial Background Investigation filed 4 June 1991, the Government Reply To Motion to Compel Funding filed 11 June 1991, the Appellant's Motion To Respond To Government Reply To Motion To Compel Funding For Background Investigation filed 13 June 1991, Appellant’s Motion to File Counsel’s Statement Of The Case Status filed 7 June 1991, and Government Reply To Defense Motion To File Statement filed 10 June 1991, it is hereby ordered:

1. That, for the reasons that follow, the Motion to Compel…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Ake v. OklahomaSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. People v. FriersonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  4. United States v. ScottUnited States Court of Military Appeals · 1987
  5. People v. DurhamCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. United States v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces · 1997
  2. United States v. EvansU.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review · 1992
  3. United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1995
  4. United States v. AndersonNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 1999
  5. United States v. ThomasNavy-Marine Corps Court of Criminal Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API