Legal Opinion

Richmond v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided March 9, 1910No. 479PublishedCited by 1 opinion

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

RAMSEY, Judge.

On the 9th day of March, 1909, an information was filed in the County Court of Wise County, charging appellant with falsely and wantonly imputing to Pearl Teague a want of chastity in that he said, in substance, that she was ruined, meaning thereby that she was guilty of illicit carnal intercourse with a man; and in another count charging her with being pregnant; and in a still further count charging that the said Pearl Teague had gone to Keene to get rid of a child, meaning thereby that the said Pearl Teague, being an unmarried woman, was pregnant with a child as the result of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Ormsby v. . DouglassNew York Court of Appeals · 1868
  2. Van Dusen v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1895

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Pickerell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1917

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API