Legal Opinion
People v. Zwack
New York County Courts
Decided June 25, 2001PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Patrick J. McGrath, J.
The Times Union and Clear Channel filed a motion on April *76226, 2001, seeking permission to be allowed to conduct audiovisual and still photographic coverage of the trial and also subsequent proceedings in the above criminal case. Both requests are based upon the argument that section 52 of the Civil Rights Law is unconstitutional, and assuming, arguendo, that it is not, it should not apply to still photography.
Both the People and defense have not submitted any papers in opposition and take no position on the motion. Section 52 of the Civil Rights Law…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior Court of Cal., Riverside Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Mountain View Coach Lines, Inc. v. StormsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Duffy v. Horton Memorial HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- MTR. OF RODRIGUEZ v. PeralesNew York Court of Appeals · 1995
- Associated Press v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Heckstall v. McGrathAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005