Legal Opinion

In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of Castanza

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 5, 2011No. OSB 09-25; SC S059032Published

1Per curiam

In this lawyer disciplinary proceeding, the Oregon State Bar charged the accused with violating Oregon Rule of Professional Conduct (RPC) 1.16(d) for failing to take reasonable steps to protect his clients’ interests when he terminated his representation of them. After an evidentiary hearing, a trial panel of the Disciplinary Board found that, when the accused withdrew from representing his two clients in a civil action that he had filed on their behalf, he violated RPC 1.16(d) by failing to: (1) allow his clients sufficient time to employ another counsel; (2) make any attempts to postpone…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of HartfieldOregon Supreme Court · 2010
  2. In Re Complaint as to the Conduct of OhOregon Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API