Legal Opinion

Foscalina v. Doyle

California Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1874No. 4,268PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of the Third Judicial District, Alameda County. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court, Wallace, C. J.:

The appeal is taken by the defendant from an order refusing to stay the issuance of a writ of habere facias upon the judgment recovered by the plaintiff in the District Court for the County of Alameda, and lately affirmed here. The appeal was perfected only on the 21st of March last, and the time allowed to the appellant to file the printed transcript of the record, under the second rule of practice, has not elapsed. The respondent produces a copy of the record, and thereupon moves that the appeal be dismissed, *152because it is frivolous and taken with intent to…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Corder v. SpeakeOregon Supreme Court · 1898
  2. In re Estate of BlytheCalifornia Supreme Court · 1895
  3. People v. SumnerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
  4. Jenks v. LurieCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
  5. O'Donnell v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API