Legal Opinion
Marquart v. City of Shaniko
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided July 25, 2024No. 3:24-cv-00236Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF OREGON ZACHARY FORREST MARQUART, Case No. 3:24-cv-236-SI Plaintiff, OPINION AND ORDER v. CITY OF SHANIKO; DAVID R. LONG; DIANA L. MARRS; SCOTT W. MARRS; DONALD RAY TREANOR; RICHARD JERRY CEREGHINO; SANDRA L. CEREGHINO; GOLDIE LEE ROBERTS; ANDREA VICTORIA KEGEL; SANDRA J. THOMAS; and NICK NIMMS, Defendants. Zachary Forrest Marquart, Plaintiff, Pro Se. Aaron Hisel, CAPITOL LEGAL SERVICES, 901 Capitol Street NE, Salem, OR 97301. Of Attorneys for Defendants. Michael H. Simon, District Judge. Plaintiff Zachary Forrest Marquart, representing…
2Cases cited42 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Hebbe v. PlilerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.