Legal Opinion
Citimortgage, Inc. v. Barabas
Indiana Court of Appeals
Decided May 17, 2011No. 48A04-1004-CC-232PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
RILEY, Judge.
STATEMENT OF THE CASE
Appellant-Intervener/Cross-Claimant, Citimortgage, Inc. (Citi), appeals the trial court’s grant of amended default judgment in favor of Appellee-Plaintiff/Cross-Claim Defendant, ReCasa Financial Group, Inc. LLC (ReCasa), and Appellee/Third-Party Defendant, Rick A. Sanders (Sanders).
We affirm.
ISSUE
Citi raises one issue on appeal, which we restate as follows: Whether the trial court abused its discretion when it declined to set aside ReCasa’s amended default judgment.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
On August 8, 2005, Shannon Barabas (Barabas) executed a…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Landmark National Bank v. KeslerSupreme Court of Kansas · 2009
- Mortgage Electronic Registration System, Inc. v. Southwest Homes of Arkansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Tacco Falcon Point, Inc. v. Atlantic Ltd. Partnership XIIIndiana Court of Appeals · 2010
3Cited by7 opinions
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. Shannon S. Barabas a/k/a Shannon Sheets Barabas, ReCasa Financial Group, LLC, and Rick A. SandersIndiana Supreme Court · 2012
- DeLage Landen Financial Services, Inc. v. Community Mental Health Center, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2012
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. BarabasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. BarabasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
- Citimortgage, Inc. v. BarabasIndiana Court of Appeals · 2011
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.