Legal Opinion · Dissent

City of El Paso v. Croom Construction Co.

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)

Decided November 17, 1993No. 08-92-00380-CVPublished

1DissentOsborn, Chief Justice

I respectfully dissent. First it must be noted that in Pogue v. Duncan, 753 S.W.2d 255 (Tex.App.—Tyler 1988), the trial court granted a petition for writ of mandamus and awarded attorney’s fees. On appeal, the Court of Appeals reversed on the grounds that attorney’s fees are not recoverable *156against a county under Tex.Civ.PRAc. & Rem. Code Ann. § 38.001 (Vernon 1986). The Texas Supreme Court reversed on the basis that the Uniform Declaratory Judgments Act expressly provides for an award of costs and reasonable and necessary attorney’s fees. Duncan v. Pogue, 759 S.W.2d 435 (Tex.1988). We must…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Duncan v. PogueTexas Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Rodeheaver v. SteigerwaldCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1991
  3. Waugh v. City of Dallas, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  4. Pogue v. Duncan, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)1988

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API