Shatto v. Schultz
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
GRAVES, Justice.
This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court of Colorado County, sitting without a jury,, decreeing — in favor of the appellees herein and against the appellant— that a vacant lot claimed by him and fronting the main business street of the Town of Columbus — that is, Milam Street in the West half of Block 8 — constituted a part of a street designated by the court as “New; Street”, and ordering that it “be and it is hereby established as a , public street”.'
No findings of either fact or law were requested .by the .parties, or filed by the court, but a statement-of-facts…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- City of Corsicana v. ZornTexas Supreme Court · 1904
- Ladies' Benev. Soc. of Beaumont v. Magnolia Cemetery Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
- Ramthun v. HalfmanTexas Supreme Court · 1883
- Boone v. City of StephenvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
- Chenowth Bros. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Schultz v. ShattoTexas Supreme Court · 1951
- Robbins v. HouckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952