Legal Opinion

Shatto v. Schultz

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1950No. 12190PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

GRAVES, Justice.

This appeal is from a judgment of the District Court of Colorado County, sitting without a jury,, decreeing — in favor of the appellees herein and against the appellant— that a vacant lot claimed by him and fronting the main business street of the Town of Columbus — that is, Milam Street in the West half of Block 8 — constituted a part of a street designated by the court as “New; Street”, and ordering that it “be and it is hereby established as a , public street”.'

No findings of either fact or law were requested .by the .parties, or filed by the court, but a statement-of-facts…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. City of Corsicana v. ZornTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Ladies' Benev. Soc. of Beaumont v. Magnolia Cemetery Co.Texas Commission of Appeals · 1926
  3. Ramthun v. HalfmanTexas Supreme Court · 1883
  4. Boone v. City of StephenvilleCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  5. Chenowth Bros. v. Magnolia Petroleum Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Schultz v. ShattoTexas Supreme Court · 1951
  2. Robbins v. HouckCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API