Kellogg v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
In Error to the Circuit Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. This cause comes here upon writ of error to review a judgment of conviction against (’.Cendant for violation of section 5480, Rev. St. U. 5. [U. S. Comp. St. 1901, p. 3696]..
1Opinion of the Court
LACOMBE, Circuit Judge.
The relevant parts of the statute read as follows:
“If any person having devised or intending to devise any scheme or artifice to defraud, * * * to be effected by either opening or intending to open correspondence or communication with any person, whether resident within *324or outside of the United States, by means of the post office establishment of the United States, or by inciting such other person or any person to open communication -with the person so devising or intending, shall, in and for executing such scheme or artifice or attempting so to do, place or cause to be…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Durland v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Milby v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
- United States v. FlemmingDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1883
- United States v. WoottenDistrict Court, E.D. South Carolina · 1887
- United States v. DurlandDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1894
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cochran v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1930
- Chew v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1925
- Wilson v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1911
- Busch v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1931
- Barnes v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1928
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.