Bing & Co.'s Successors v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, G. A. 7210 (T. D. 31520).
1Opinion of the CourtSmith, Judge
Certain pots, baskets, bonbonieres, jardinieres, bowls, inkstands, boxes, blotter and paper holders, candlesticks, and coupes of earthen*212ware, reported by the deputy appraiser to be ornamented with bronze, were classified by the collector of customs at the port of New York as ornamented earthenware and assessed for duty at 60 per cent ad valorem under the provisions of paragraph 93 of the tariff act of August 5, 1909, of which paragraph the part material to this case reads as follows:
93. China, * * *, earthen, * * *, and crockery ware, including clock cases with or without movements, * * *,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Seeberger v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Carter v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1910
- United States v. MeadowsCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1911
- Vandiver v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1912
3Cited by5 opinions
- Commercial Adolfo S. Pagan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1962
- Field v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1916
- J. M. Rodgers Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1967
- Arthur H. Thomas Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939
- New York Merchandise Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1940