Legal Opinion

Radford v. Radford

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 24, 1931No. 4065PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLevy, J.

(after stating the case as above).

The plaintiff in error by his assignments of error presents, in effect, the points in view, as grounds requiring the decree of divorce to be set aside and vacated, namely:(1) That his petition was subject to a general demurrer because lacking in averment of sufficient legal grounds for divorce;(2) That the judgment was tafeen by default without service of citation and without an appearance, acceptance, or waiver of process by the defendant;(3) That the judgment was by default at a term of court before the return term of court and appearance day at which the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. McCullough v. McCulloughTexas Supreme Court · 1931
  2. St. Louis & San Francisco Railroad v. HaleTexas Supreme Court · 1918
  3. Hill v. BaylorTexas Supreme Court · 1859
  4. Mueller v. HeidemeyerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. McAlister v. McAlisterTexas Supreme Court · 1888

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Ex Parte J. C. HodgesTexas Supreme Court · 1937
  2. McFarland v. ReynoldsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1974
  3. Landrum v. Centennial Rural High School Dist. No. 2Court of Appeals of Texas · 1939
  4. Kollenborn v. KollenbornCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  5. Steger v. ShofnerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API