Legal Opinion

Gaehwiler v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Board

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 28, 1983No. Civ. 54475PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT. *

Gaehwiler Construction Company appeals from a judgment denying a writ of mandamus. (Lab. Code, §§ 6627-6629; Code Civ. Proc., § 1094.5.) The judgment had the effect of affirming a decision against appellant by the Occupational Safety and Health Appeals Board (hereafter, Board). We affirm.

On April 12, 1976, appellant’s construction site in San Francisco was cited for single violations of title 8, section 1644, subdivision (a)(6), and section 1768, of the California Administrative Code. (Hereafter, respectively, the scaffold regulation and the powerline regulation.) Appellant…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Estate of TeedCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
  2. In Re Marriage of MixCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Steve P. Rados, Inc. v. California Occupational Safety & Health Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
  4. Fair Employment Practice Commission v. State Personnel BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
  5. Newbery Electric Corp. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Leonardini v. Shell Oil Co.California Court of Appeal · 1989
  2. Davey Tree Surgery Co. v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
  3. L & S Framing Inc. v. Cal. Occupational Saf. & Health Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2023
  4. Ventura Coastal v. Occupational Safety & Health Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API