Hernandez v. Veterans Administration
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DISMISSING ACTIONS
OLIVER J. CARTER, Chief Judge.
These two actions have been consolidated for purposes of arguing and deciding motions to dismiss made by the defendants. The following order applies to both of the above-entitled actions.
Plaintiffs have performed alternative service as conscientious objectors pursuant to the Military Selective Service Act of 1967, 50 U.S.C.App. § 456(j). On completion of their service, plaintiffs applied for educational benefits under the Veterans Readjustment Benefits Act, 38 U.S.C. §§ 1651-1687, and were denied such benefits. By these actions the…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Flemming v. NestorSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Braunfeld v. BrownSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- O'Callahan v. ParkerSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Gillette v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hernandez v. Veterans' AdministrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Robison v. JohnsonDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1973
- Hernandez v. Veterans' AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972
- Henry Hernandez Thomas J. Wolf and the Class Represented v. Veterans' Administration, Peter Miller and Gary Lehn v. Veterans Administration of the United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1972