Legal Opinion
Robison v. Johnson
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided January 4, 1973No. Civ. A. 72-434-GPublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GARRITY, District Judge.
Plaintiff Robison seeks a declaratory judgment, on behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, that the system of veterans’ educational benefits provided in 38 U.S.C. §§ 101(21), 1652(a)(1) and 1661(a), as amended, violates the First and Fifth Amendments to the Constitution of the United States. Plaintiff also seeks a declaratory judgment that he and the members of his class are eligible to receive such educational benefits. Defendants are the Administrator of Veterans’ Affairs and the Veterans Administration. The court has before it plaintiff’s motion…
2Cases cited44 opinions
- Brown v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shapiro v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Sherbert v. VernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Johnson v. RobisonSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Traynor v. TurnageSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Harrigfeld v. District Court of Seventh Judicial District Ex Rel. County of FreemontIdaho Supreme Court · 1973
- K.C. v. Individual Members of the Medical Licensing BoardCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2024
- Evelyn Elisabeth Kirkhuff v. Robert P. Nimmo, Administrator, Veterans AffairsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1982
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.