Legal Opinion

Robinson v. Hammel

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 24, 1942No. 35,363PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Harvey, J.:

This action involves the sufficiency and legality of certain provisions of a will. The trial court held them to be valid, and heirs of the testatrix have appealed.

To avoid expense, the parties have stipulated the material portions of the record. This may be summarized as follows: Mrs. L. A. Snell, a resident of Clay county, died testate February 9,1940, leaving an estate of more than $17,000. By her will, in the introductory paragraph, she revoked all former wills and codicils thereto. By Item I she directed her executor to pay all her just…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Estate of HinckleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  2. Assessors of Boston v. Garland School of Home MakingMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1937
  3. People v. Young Men's Christian Ass'nIllinois Supreme Court · 1936
  4. City of Bangor v. Rising Virtue Lodge, No. 10Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1882
  5. Dulles's EstateSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1907

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wilson v. FlowersSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1971
  2. H. Wadsworth Hight, One of the Executors of the Will of Alice F. Cochran, Deceased v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
  3. In Re KueblerNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  4. Fairview Cemetery Co. v. KingsleyNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1969
  5. Carter v. Sterling Lodge No. 171Supreme Court of Kansas · 1964

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API