Legal Opinion

Titlebaum v. Tobin

Massachusetts District Court, Appellate Division

Decided March 25, 1942Published

1Opinion of the CourtPettingell, P. J.

Action of contract in which the plaintiff seeks to recover on a quantum meruit for legal services rendered the defendant. The answer is a general denial and payment.

The undisputed facts are that the plaintiff, an attorney at law, went to the defendant’s residence at the request of a relative of the defendant, finding the defendant confined to his bed. The relative introduced the plaintiff to the defendant as an attorney who could handle the defendant’s claim for a pension from the City of Boston by which he was employed.

*70There was testimony that the defendant told the plaintiff that if he got…

2Cases cited32 opinions

  1. DiLorenzo v. Atlantic National BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  2. MacLeod v. DavisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1935
  3. Russell v. FoleyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1932
  4. Day v. CatonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1876
  5. McGarrahan v. New York, New Haven, & Hartford RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1898

27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API