Legal Opinion · Dissent

Doe v. Boys Clubs of Greater Dallas, Inc.

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 8, 1995No. 94-0281Published

1Dissent

GAMMAGE, Justice, joined by HIGHTOWER, CORNYN and SPECTOR, Justices,

dissenting.

The only issue presented in this ease is whether the plaintiffs raised a genuine issue of material fact, thereby precluding summary judgment for the defendant. Because the plaintiffs’ affidavits clearly raise a fact issue whether Boys Club’s admitted misrepresentations produced or proximately caused the plaintiffs’ injuries, I dissent.

Proximate cause requires both cause-in-fact and foreseeability. Travis v. City of Mesquite, 830 S.W.2d 94, 98 (Tex.1992). An act or omission is a cause-in-fact if it is a substantial…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Travis v. City of MesquiteTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. Prudential Insurance Co. of America v. Jefferson Associates, Ltd.Texas Supreme Court · 1995
  4. Board of Education v. A, C and S, Inc.Illinois Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Union Pump Co. v. AllbrittonTexas Supreme Court · 1995

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API