Legal Opinion

Amado Unemployment Compensation Case

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 14, 1955No. Appeal, 250PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Woodside, J.,

This is an appeal from the Unemployment Compensation Board of Beview’s denial of the appellant’s claim for unemployment compensation on the ground that his unemployment was “due to voluntarily leaving work without good cause” within the meaning of Section 402(b) of the Unemployment Compensation Law, Act of December 5, 1936, P. L. 2897, §402 as amended by the Act of August 24, 1953, P. L. 1397, §4, 43 PS §802.

There is no dispute as to the material facts in this appeal and they may be summarized in the following manner:

The claimant was last employed as a credit manager by…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Campbell Unemployment Compensation CaseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1954

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Missouri Division of Employment Security v. Labor & Industrial Relations CommissionSupreme Court of Missouri · 1983
  2. Dillard Department Stores, Inc. v. PolinskyNebraska Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Porter v. Florida Unemployment Appeals CommissionDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2009
  4. Lovrekovic v. Commonwealth, Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. Jones & Langhlin Steel Corp. v. Unemployment Compensation Board of ReviewSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1963

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API