Legal Opinion

United States v. Leslie Salt Co.

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 5, 1956No. 74PublishedCited by 133 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Harlan

On February 1, 1949, Leslie Salt Company, being in need of funds to meet maturing bank loans and for work ing capital, borrowed $3,000,000 from the Mutual Life Insurance Company of New York and $1,000,000 from the Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Company. As evidence of the indebtedness Leslie Salt delivered to each insurance company its “3 1 /4% Sinking Fund Promissory Note Due February 1, 1964” in these amounts. The question presented is whether these instruments are subject to the documentary stamp taxes laid on “all bonds, debentures, or certificates of indebtedness issued by any corporation…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Norwegian Nitrogen Products Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
  2. Corn Products Refining Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Brewster v. GageSupreme Court of the United States · 1930
  4. Fawcus MacHine Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
  5. United States v. IshamSupreme Court of the United States · 1873

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by133 opinions

  1. National Muffler Dealers Assn., Inc. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. Commissioner v. P. G. Lake, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1958
  3. Environmental Defense Fund v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
  4. Fribourg Navigation Co. v. CommissionerSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  5. Phil Whitus and Leon Davis v. R. P. Balkcom, Jr., Warden, State Penitentiary, Reidsville, GeorgiaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1964

128 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API