Hicks v. Murphy
Court of Appeals of Texas
Error from District Court, McMullen County. Action by F. G. Hicks against J. E. Murphy and others. Judgment for defendants, and plaintiff brings error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoursund, J.
On February 2, 1914, plaintiff in error, Hicks, applied to Hon. F. G. Chambliss, judge of the Thirty-Sixth judicial district, for an injunction restraining J. E. Murphy and C. W. Kuykendall from selling, under deed of trust with power of sale, certain land situated in McMullen county, which had been advertised to be sold on February 3, 1914. The temporary injunction was granted without notice to the defend-. ants, and, in fact, the time was too short to-give such notice, plaintiff having applied for the injunction on the day before the sale was to take place, but alleged no reason for so long…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Texas & N. O. R'y Co. v. WhiteTexas Supreme Court · 1882
- Bullard v. HarknessSupreme Court of Iowa · 1891
- Kiam v. Cummings & SonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1896
- Johnson v. MoserSupreme Court of Iowa · 1887
- Appleton v. DraughnCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1895
3Cited by2 opinions
- Womack v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1932
- Ables v. WaggonerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1919