Bullard v. Harkness
Supreme Court of Iowa
Appeal from Humboldt District Court. — Hon. George H. Carr, Judge. This is an action upon an injunction bond. There was an answer denying generally, and setting up a counterclaim, to which a reply was filed denying the same. A trial was had to the court resulting in a judgment dismissing the plaintiff’s petition, and in favor of the defendants on the counterclaim. The plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtGiven, J.
1. injunction: bond: damages: expenses. I. The appellant, having a judgment and decree of foreclosure against certain lands, was proceediug to sell the same on special execution. The appellee Prouty, claiming to be the owner of the lands under a tax deed, brought an action to enjoin the sale and to quiet his title, and, to procure the, issuance of the injunction, executed the bond sued upon, with the appellee Harkness, as his surety. On final hearing it was *375decreed that the appellee Prouty held the lands as trustee for the appellant, that the injunction be dissolved, and that the appellee…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Behrens v. McKenzieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1867
- Langworthy v. McKelveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1868
- Reece v. NorthwaySupreme Court of Iowa · 1882
- Carroll County v. Iowa Railroad LandSupreme Court of Iowa · 1880
- Ford v. LoomisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1883
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Leonard v. Capital InsuranceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1897
- Chicago, Anamosa & Northern Railway Co. v. WhitneySupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
- Colby v. MeserveySupreme Court of Iowa · 1892
- Williams v. BallingerSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
- Jameson v. BartlettNebraska Supreme Court · 1902
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.