State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. Hallowell
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice.
This interlocutory appeal requires us to construe a Statute governing the “uninsured motorist” clause in a Delaware insurance contract. Specifically, the issue is whether the Superior Court erred, as a mat ter of law, in determining that, under 18 Del.C. § 3902, such a policy provision includes “under-insured motorist” coverage. 1 We conclude that the Trial Court’s ruling was erroneous and, accordingly, reverse the judgment.
I
The pertinent facts are these:
On November 2, 1975, William E. Hallo-well (plaintiff) was injured and his wife died in an automobile accident in Delaware.…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Porter v. Empire Fire and Marine Insurance CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1970
- Simonette v. Great American InsuranceSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1973
- Gorton v. Reliance Insurance CompanySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
- Palisbo v. Hawaiian Insurance & Guaranty Co., Ltd.Hawaii Supreme Court · 1976
- Detrick v. Aetna Casualty and Surety CompanySupreme Court of Iowa · 1968
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Travelers Indemnity Co. v. LakeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1991
- Hallowell v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceSupreme Court of Delaware · 1982
- State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance v. ArmsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1984
- Home Insurance Co. v. MaldonadoSupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Blackburn v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1985
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.