Legal Opinion

Deyling v. Flowers

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided March 31, 1983No. 45281PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPryatel, J.

In August 1976, Kenneth and Yvonne Deyling filed a complaint against Stanley and Victoria Flowers claiming interference with an easement. Defendants answered and counterclaimed, 1 seeking damages and a declaration of rights concerning the easement. After trial the court found for plaintiffs. This judgment was appealed and this court reversed on grounds not pertinent to this appeal. The case was again tried and judgment granted once more in favor of plaintiffs.

Plaintiffs’ property is located at the rear of defendants’ property and does not front on any roadway. Defendant’s property on the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Trattar v. RauschOhio Supreme Court · 1950
  2. 953 Realty Corp. v. Southern Boulevard Realty Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. K & K Food Services, Inc. v. S & H, INC.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2000
  2. State v. HaynesOhio Court of Appeals · 2013
  3. Bank of America, N.A. v. MillerOhio Court of Appeals · 2011
  4. Yowonske v. MDB Constr. Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 2010
  5. Dawson v. JonesDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API