Legal Opinion
American Fruit Growers, Inc. v. S. T. Runzo & Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided March 6, 1951No. Civ. A. No. 9090PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOURLEY, District Judge.
The matters before the Court arise out of an appeal by S. T. Runzo & Co., Inc., hereinafter referred to as “Runzo”, from a reparation order of the Secretary of Agriculture in which damages were awarded in the amount of $1497.80, with interest, in favor of American Fruit Growers, Inc., hereinafter referred to as “American.”
Motions have been filed by American as follows:
1. Motion for judgment on the pleadings.
2. Motion to dismiss appeal of Runzo from reparation order entered by the Secretary of Agriculture in favor of American.
3. Motion to strike answer of Runzo to claim…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Kroese v. General Steel Castings CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1950
- Hill v. Federal Trade CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1941
- Spano v. Western Fruit Growers, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1936
- Art Metal Const. Co. Ex Rel. McCloskey & Co. v. Lehigh Structural Steel Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
- Ernest E. Fadler Co. v. HesserCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1948
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- In RE SHEPPARD v. RhayWashington Supreme Court · 1968
- Monteverde's Inc. v. Italian Oven, Inc. (In Re Italian Oven, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Ritchie v. HendersonDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2001
- Consolidated Citrus Company v. GoldsteinDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1963
- Bell AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.