Legal Opinion

People v. Hillman

New York Court of Appeals

Decided November 22, 1927PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLehman, J.

The defendants have been indicted by the grand jury of the county of Orange upon a charge of robbery in the first degree committed upon a public highway in the town of Highlands in the county of Orange. They have been convicted of the crime charged after trial in the County Court of Orange county. It is not disputed that the People presented testimony, not contradicted by any evidence produced on behalf of the defendants, which shows that' the defendants did commit a robbery as charged, upon a highway within the geo graphical limits of the town of Highlands and of the county of Orange. If the…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Fort Leavenworth Railroad v. LoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Benson v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
  3. Rogers v. CadyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Palmer v. BarrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
  5. United States v. JackalowSupreme Court of the United States · 1862

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. James Stewart & Co. v. SadrakulaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
  2. People v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1978
  3. People v. GayheartMichigan Court of Appeals · 2009
  4. People v. HetenyiNew York Court of Appeals · 1952
  5. Arledge v. MabryNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1948

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API