Legal Opinion

Egan, Admr. v. United Gas Imp. Co.

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 24, 1935No. Appeal, 244PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice Maxey,

John Stotz, now deceased, owned six shares of preferred stock and 285 shares of common stock of the United Gas Improvement Company of Philadelphia. He died April 13, 1932, and left a will which was duly probated, in which he appointed a friend, executor and trustee. Four days after Stotz’s death, this stock was delivered to Edward B. Smith & Company (hereinafter referred to as the company), by the man (also now deceased) whom Stotz had named as executor. At that time the company did not know, that Stotz was dead. These certificates were endorsed for transfer with…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Findlay & Hay v. KeimSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1869
  2. Fifth Street Building & Loan Ass'n v. KornfeldSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1934
  3. Holt v. McWilliamsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1902

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Schwartz v. RockeySupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2007
  2. Frye v. Commonwealth Investment Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1963
  3. First Nat. Bank v. Pittsburgh, F. W. & C. Ry. Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1939
  4. Boosel v. Agricultural InsuranceSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1935
  5. Lesavoy Industries, Inc. v. Pennsylvania General Paper Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API