Legal Opinion

Petras v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 24, 1993No. 93 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

DOYLE, Judge.

This is an appeal by William Petras (Claimant) from an order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed a referee’s decision denying Claimant’s petition for reinstatement of “suspended” benefits.

The following facts are pertinent. Claimant filed a claim petition on October 12, 1981 alleging a sensory neural hearing loss as a result of exposure to loud noise at the work site. In his claim petition the Claimant sought only medical expenses in the form of payment for a hearing aide. Claimant’s petition was granted and Employer was ordered to pay for the hearing…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pieper v. Ametek-Thermox Instruments DivisionSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Fuhrman v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  3. United States Steel Corp. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  4. Montgomery v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1979
  5. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. DelCimmutoCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Bortz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API