Legal Opinion
Leykin v. AT & T CORP.
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided March 23, 2006No. 02 Civ. 1765(LLS)PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
STANTON, District Judge.
In these consolidated and related securities class actions, defendants move to dismiss the first amended (and predecessor) complaints and the proposed third amended complaint (“PTAC”), which plaintiffs tender as their best statement of “loss causation.”
FACTS
The facts set forth below are taken from the PTAC, the documents referenced therein and publicly available financial filings. Rothman v. Gregor, 220 F.3d 81, 88 (2d Cir.2000). The facts are presumed to be true for purposes of this motion. Papasan v. Allain, 478 U.S. 265, 283, 106 S.Ct. 2932, 2943,…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Conley v. GibsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Dura Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. BroudoSupreme Court of the United States · 2005
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- In Re Bristol Myers Squibb Co. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2008
- In Re Enron Corp. SecuritiesDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2006
- In re Gentiva Securities LitigationDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 2013
- Richman v. Goldman Sachs Group, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 2012
- In Re American International Group, Inc. 2008 Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2010
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.