Legal Opinion

Wooten v. Nash

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided April 6, 1972No. 46881PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pannell, Judge.

Appellant obtained a verdict against the defendant-appellees. The appellees’ motion for a new trial on the usual general grounds and two special grounds was heard by the trial judge and the following order entered thereon: “The defendants’ motion for new trial as amended in the above styled case having come on before this court for a hearing and argument and briefs of counsel for all parties having been heard thereon and considered, It is hereby ordered that a new trial be granted in said case.” Appellant, with proper certificate for review, entered his appeal to this court.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Fugazzi, Lovelace & Co. v. TomlinsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  2. Glenn v. TankersleySupreme Court of Georgia · 1938
  3. CTC Finance Corporation v. HoldenSupreme Court of Georgia · 1966
  4. Rowe Bros. Motor Express Co. v. Twiggs CountySupreme Court of Georgia · 1922
  5. Smith v. Maddox-Rucker Banking Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1910

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Edgeman v. ThomasCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1974
  2. Henderson Construction Co. v. Farmers Mutual Exchange of Decatur, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1972

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API