Legal Opinion
Glenn v. Tankersley
Supreme Court of Georgia
Decided November 19, 1938No. 12482PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Jenkins, Justice.
1. If the verdict was not demanded by the law and the evidence, the Supreme Court will not disturb the first grant of a new trial, and will not determine special grounds of the motion; and this is true irrespective of whether or not the new trial may have been granted on such a ground. Cox v. Grady, 132 Ga. 368 (64 S. E. 262), and cit.; Weinkle v. Brunswick &c. Railroad Co., 107 Ga. 367 (33 S. E. 471) ; Jones Motor Co. v. Finch Motor Co., 34 Ga. App. 399 (129 S. E. 915).
2. The description in the deed upon which the claimants relied sufficiently identified the property as the…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Weinkle & Sons v. Brunswick & Western RailroadSupreme Court of Georgia · 1899
- Cox v. GradySupreme Court of Georgia · 1909
- Martin v. WhiteSupreme Court of Georgia · 1902
- Cothran v. ForsythSupreme Court of Georgia · 1882
- Anderson v. BlytheSupreme Court of Georgia · 1875
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Sears, Roebuck & Co. v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Sears, Roebuck & Company v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1960
- Childress v. NordmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- Avary v. AvarySupreme Court of Georgia · 1947
- McCluskey v. American Oil Co.Supreme Court of Georgia · 1968
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.