Legal Opinion

Dimond v. Macfarlane

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided September 27, 1897PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal prom Circuit Judge, First Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

FREAR, J.

This is a suit in equity for specific performance. The bill sets forth an oral agreement whereby Dimond was to assign to Macfarlane his lease from the Trustees of the B. P. Bishop estate of the premises occupied by him as a residence at Waikiki, Honolulu, and Macfarlane was to sublet to Dimond a specified portion *182of tbe premises, at a specified rental and upon tbe terms and conditions contained in the lease, for tbe remainder of tbe term of tbe lease and for tbe entire term of any renewal or extension thereof that Macfarlane might obtain from tbe Trustees; that…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Green v. GrovesIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
  2. Opunui v. KauhiHawaii Supreme Court · 1882
  3. Merrill v. PeaseSupreme Court of Vermont · 1879
  4. Mokuai v. KapuniaiHawaii Supreme Court · 1875

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. De Luz v. RamosHawaii Supreme Court · 1931
  2. Henriques v. KalokuokamaileHawaii Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Ideta v. KubaHawaii Supreme Court · 1913

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API