Legal Opinion

Gemmell v. Indemnity Company

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided August 19, 2019No. 2:18-cv-11257Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MICHIGAN SOUTHERN DIVISION KATHLEEN GEMMELL, 2:18-cv-11257 Plaintiff, HON. TERRENCE G. BERG v. ENCOMPASS INDEMNITY ORDER DENYING COMPANY, DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT Defendant. Plaintiff Kathleen Gemmell seeks recovery from her insurance company, Defendant Encompass Indemnity Company, for injuries she says she sustained when the suspension fell out of her car while she was driving in Madison Heights, Michigan. She is suing, under Michigan’s No-Fault Act,

Mich. Comp. Laws § 500.3101

et seq., for personal protection insurance (“PIP”)…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Rory v. Continental InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 2005

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API