Legal Opinion

Tony & Leo, Inc. v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided July 20, 1979No. 48273PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROGOSHESKE, Justice.

Defendant AID Insurance Services (AID), surety on a subcontractor’s performance bond, appeals from an adverse judgment in an action on the bond by plaintiff Tony and Leo, Inc. (Tony & Leo). The principal issues raised are whether the trial court erred by permitting Tony & Leo to recover from AID on the bond and by refusing to permit AID to recover indemnity from Tony & Leo. We hold that the trial court decided both issues erroneously and, therefore, we reverse with directions to the trial court to modify its judgment in accordance with this opinion.

This lawsuit grew out of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. State v. WoodSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1928

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Augusta Court Co-Owners' Ass'n v. Levin, Roth & Kasner, P.C., Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston)1998
  2. Vetter v. Security Continental Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  3. Epland v. Meade Insurance Agency Associates, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1997
  4. Botten v. ShormaCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  5. Jedco Development Co., Inc. v. BertschNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1989

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API