County Commissioners v. C. E. Johnson & Co.
Supreme Court of Florida
Appeal from the Circuit Court for Polk county. The facts of the case are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Raney
This is a motion for a rule upon the appellees to show cause why they should not be attached for violating a supersedeas granted by a Justice of this court.
It now appears that intervening the entry of the appeal and the granting of such order the writ of mandamus was obeyed, and the appellees obtained the license to sell liquor from the Collector of Revenue. This' was of course unknown to myself or the other Justices of the court with whom I consulted and with whose concurrence I acted when I made the order.
A supersedeas to a final judgment not performed stays the execution thereof, but does…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- O'Hara v. MacConnellSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Board of Commissioners v. GormanSupreme Court of the United States · 1874
3Cited by7 opinions
- Sparkman v. State ex rel. Bank of Ybor CitySupreme Court of Florida · 1916
- Kennett v. BarberSupreme Court of Florida · 1947
- Thalheim v. Camp Phosphate Co.Supreme Court of Florida · 1904
- Betts v. State ex rel. JorgensenNebraska Supreme Court · 1903
- Walker v. SarvenSupreme Court of Florida · 1899
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.