Legal Opinion

Commercial Trust Co. of Hagerstown v. Burch

District Court, S.D. Georgia

Decided July 23, 1920No. 174PublishedCited by 4 opinions

At Law. Action by the Commercial Trust Company, of Hagerstown against H. C. Burch and others. On plea in bar and demurrers.

1Opinion of the Court

SIBLEY, District Judge.

In this suit at law in six counts the plaintiff seeks to hold personally liable the county commissioners, clerk, treasurer, and attorney of Laurens county because of their connections with the issuance of certain repudiated notes of the county given for borrowed money. Each count is demurred to. The main facts alleged in each are these:

On January 10, 1918, the county commissioners passed a resolution declaring that there was “a casual and temporary deficiency in the public funds in the treasury of the county of Laurens, .and a casual and temporary need of money to meet…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Gordon v. ButlerSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  2. Amy v. The SupervisorsSupreme Court of the United States · 1871
  3. Bowen v. . MandevilleNew York Court of Appeals · 1884
  4. Sweet v. Montpelier Savings Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1904
  5. Briggs v. BrushaberMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Price v. OwenCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1942
  2. City of Tacoma v. PetersonWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  3. State Bank v. Estate of BralySupreme Court of Kansas · 1934
  4. Muir v. MartinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API