Lucas v. Shively
District Court, W.D. Virginia
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
MICHAEL F. URBANSKI, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the summary judgment motions of defendants Patrick Lamb (“Lamb”) and Gary L. Shively (“Shively”). Dkt. Nos. 37 & 38, respectively. Both defendants assert that qualified immunity bars this civil rights action. The court heard oral argument on these motions on April 25, 2014. Dkt. No. 60. At that time, the court requested supplemental briefing on fingerprint analysis, specifically the verification step of the “ACE-V” (analysis, comparison, evaluation, and verification) process. The parties have filed their…
2Cases cited48 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Pearson v. CallahanSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Clark, Jr v. CarlDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
- Davis v. LancasterDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2024
- Flanagan v. ScearceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
- Flanagan v. ScearceDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2021
- Henderson v. McClainDistrict Court, W.D. Virginia · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.