Legal Opinion

State v. Hickman/Hickman

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided October 8, 2015No. CC CR1001094; CA A150127; SC S061896 (Control); CC CR1001093; CA A150126; SC S061902PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLinder, J.

Defendants Dale and Shannon Hickman were convicted of second-degree manslaughter (ORS 163.125) after they declined to seek medical treatment for their son David, who died about nine hours after he was born prematurely. Defendants are members of the Followers of Christ Church. That church encourages its members to rely on God to heal sickness and injury, and considers resorting to conventional medicine as a failure in faith. At trial, defendants argued that, because they withheld medical treatment from David based on their religious beliefs, the Oregon Constitution requires the state to prove…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Employment Div., Dept. of Human Resources of Ore. v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  2. Farmers Ins. Co. of Oregon v. MowryOregon Supreme Court · 2011
  3. Couey v. AtkinsOregon Supreme Court · 2015
  4. Cooper v. Eugene School District No. 4JOregon Supreme Court · 1986
  5. G. L. v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1988

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Klein v. Or. Bureau of Labor & Indus.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. Richardson v. Northwest Christian UniversityDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 2017
  3. OR-OSHA v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
  4. State v. RossiterCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. Hickman/HickmanOregon Supreme Court · 2015

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API