Legal Opinion · Dissent

CIT Financial Services v. Herb's Indoor RV Center, Inc.

Idaho Court of Appeals

Decided June 5, 1990No. 17578Published

1DissentBurnett, Judge

The dispositive issue — indeed, the only issue remaining after the first appeal in this case — is whether CIT Financial Services has acted in a commercially reasonable manner as required by I.C. § 28-9-504(3). To this question the district court answered “yes.” My colleagues have voted to affirm, yet they do not discuss the reasonableness issue directly. For reasons set forth below, I respectfully dissent.

I

Begging the reader’s indulgence, I will recount briefly the narrative and procedural facts framing the issue of commercial reasonableness. A retailer (Herb’s Indoor RV Center) sold a…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Native Alaskan Reclamation & Pest Control, Inc. v. United Bank AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1984
  2. ITT Terryphone Corp. v. Modems Plus, Inc.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1984
  3. Ayares-Eisenberg Perrine v. Sun BankDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984
  4. McGill v. Idaho Bank & Trust Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1981
  5. Snake River Equipment Co. v. ChristensenIdaho Court of Appeals · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API