Legal Opinion

Ankerman v. Mancuso

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided November 4, 2003No. SC 17086PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant’s petition for certification for appeal from the Appellate Court, 79 Conn. App. 480 (AC 23369), is granted, limited to the following issue:

*926The Supreme Court docket number is SC 17086. James Colin Mulholland, in support of the petition. William L. Ankerman, pro se, in opposition. Decided November 4, 2003

“Did the Appellate Court properly conclude that the trial court improperly refused to enforce a secondary mortgage loan transaction made by an attorney with a client despite its finding that the transaction violated the public policy underlying rule 1.8 (j) of the Rules of…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Ankerman v. MancusoConnecticut Appellate Court · 2003

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Ankerman v. MancusoSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API