Nat Katz & Associates, Ltd. v. Barber

Ruffin, Judge.

Nat Katz & Associates, Ltd. (“Katz”) sued Ronald Barber for payment of goods and services that Katz provided to ICR, Inc. (“ICR”). Katz sought to hold Barber personally liable for ICR’s debt, alleging that Barber, the president of ICR, is the company’s alter ego. Following a bench trial, the trial court found insufficient evidence to pierce ICR’s corporate veil and entered judgment for Barber. Katz appeals, and for reasons that follow, we affirm.

1. In two enumerations of error, Katz argues, in essence, that the trial court erred in refusing to pierce the corporate veil. On…