Hull v. Calkins
California Supreme Court
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
This is an appeal hy the plaintiff from a judgment rendered against him on demurrer to the complaint. The case as alleged is in substance as follows:—
April 7, 1888, one Alexander More was the owner of certain lands in the Sespe Rancho in the county of Ventura, and of a contract of the Pacific Improvement Company, agreeing to pay him one half of the proceeds of the sales of land conveyed to it by his deed of.even date; and on that day executed to the defendant Calkins a deed conveying to him the lands and assigned to him the contract referred to, in trust to sell the same and with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Quivey v. BakerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Conyers v. MericlesIndiana Supreme Court · 1881
- Snyder v. IvesSupreme Court of Iowa · 1875
- Miller v. KolbIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- More v. CalkinsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Hanlon v. Western Loan & Building Co.California Court of Appeal · 1941
- Alfalfa Lumber Co. v. MudgettCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1917
- State v. Kahua Ranch, LimitedHawaii Supreme Court · 1963
- Trachtenberg v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1946
- Stillwater National Bank & Trust Co. v. WoolleyCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.