Legal Opinion · Dissent

State v. Balthrop

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 31, 1983Published

1DissentSchreiber, J.

In State v. Sands, 76 N.J. 127 (1978), we held that N.J.S.A. 2A:81-12 did not set down a wooden rule that the conviction of a crime may always be introduced into evidence to affect the credibility of any witness. Rather, the applicability of the statute in any given case depended on the nature of the crime for which the witness had been convicted, its remoteness and the *548danger of prejudice, delay or confusion. In Sands we also noted that, because of the statute, ordinarily evidence of prior convictions should be admitted and placed the burden of justifying exclusion on the party seeking…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. SandsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1978
  2. Hager v. WeberSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1951
  3. State v. HarkinsNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981
  4. State v. BalthropNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API