Legal Opinion

Lincoln National Bank v. Lampe

District Court, N.D. Illinois

Decided March 11, 1976No. 75 C 2806PublishedCited by 66 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

DECKER, District Judge.

Plaintiff The Lincoln National Bank, asserting that it has been defrauded in several transactions concerning defendant Lampe, has brought this action against Lampe and others under various provisions of federal securities law and in an action for common law fraud.

Count I is based on Section 17 of the Securities Act of 1933 (15 U.S.C. § 77q), 1 Section 10 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 (15 U.S.C. § 78j), 2 and under Rule 10b-5, and concerns the same factual situation as Count III, the pendent state law fraud claim.

The gist of these two counts is…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Superintendent of Insurance of New York v. Bankers Life & Casualty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Tcherepnin v. KnightSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Birnbaum v. Newport Steel Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1952
  5. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 93,590 David Segal v. Lawrence Gordon, and Coburn Corporation of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by66 opinions

  1. Terry v. TerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  2. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 96,780 Harold J. O'Brien v. Continental Illinois National Bank and Trust Company of Chicago, a National Banking AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1979
  3. United States v. Kensington HospitalDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Breeden v. Richmond Community CollegeDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1997
  5. Adair v. Hunt International Resources Corp.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1981

61 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API