Legal Opinion

Harry Novicki, a Minor, by Harlan Novicki, His Guardian, and Harlan Novicki and Mary Novicki v. Blaw-Knox Company, a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit

Decided June 14, 1962No. 13671PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HASTIE, Circuit Judge.

The question on this appeal is whether the evidence warranted a verdict for the plaintiffs in an action against a landowner for negligent injury of an infant trespasser.

In several respects this case is an almost classic example of injury to a child caused by an attractive nuisance. Appel-lee, Blaw-Knox Co., is a manufacturer whose premises included a large open area near a housing project. In that area appellee was accustomed to assemble and leave bulky machines and materials for which it had no future use pending disposition of the accumulation as scrap or junk. The…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Kuhns v. BruggerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1957
  2. Bartleson v. Glen Alden Coal Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  3. McHugh Et Ux. v. Reading Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1943
  4. Patterson v. Palley Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1948
  5. Dugan v. Pennsylvania RailroadSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1956

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Slavish v. RatajczakSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Schorah v. CareySupreme Court of Delaware · 1975
  3. Schorah v. CareySuperior Court of Delaware · 1974
  4. Rodriguez v. WinikerMassachusetts District Court, Appellate Division · 2004
  5. Harry Novicki, a Minor, by Harlan Novicki, His Guardian, and Harlan Novicki and Mary Novicki v. Blaw-Knox Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1962

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API