Legal Opinion

Aero Systems Engineering, Inc. v. Opron, Inc.

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided July 31, 1998No. CIV. 97-1968 (JRT/RLE)PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ORDER

TUNHEIM, District Judge.

This dispute arose out of the construction of a jet engine testing facility for Rolls-Royee(Canada) in Lachine, Quebec. Plaintiff Aero Systems Engineering, Inc. (“ASE”) and defendant Opron, Inc. submitted a successful bid for the project. ASE acted as a subcontractor, and Opron as the general contractor. In 1997, Opron drew upon ASE’s line of credit. ASE claims Opron did not have a right to use its line of credit. ASE commenced this action against Opron for breach of contract, conversion and fraud. Opron moved to dismiss the complaint based on lack of personal…

2Cases cited30 opinions

  1. International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
  2. Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
  4. Helicopteros Nacionales De Colombia, S. A. v. HallSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  5. Gulf Oil Corp. v. GilbertSupreme Court of the United States · 1947

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Lorillard Tobacco Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  2. Multi-Tech Systems, Inc. v. Vocaltec Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  3. Alpine Atlantic Asset Management AG v. ComstockDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2008
  4. St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Courtney Enterprises, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2000
  5. Minnesota Public Radio v. Virginia Beach Educational Broadcasting Foundation, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2007

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API