Legal Opinion
St. Paul Fire and Marine Ins. Co. v. Courtney Enterprises, Inc.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided August 9, 2000No. Civil 00-1390 ADM/AJBPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
MONTGOMERY, District Judge.
I. INTRODUCTION
Petitioners St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company and St. Paul Guardian Insurance Company (collectively, “St. Paul”) seek to compel arbitration [Doc. No. 1] against Respondent Courtney Enterprises, Inc. (“Courtney”). In response, Courtney filed a motion to dismiss for lack of personal jurisdiction [Doc. No. 3]. The undersigned United States District Judge heard both motions on July 11, 2000. For the reasons set forth below, St. Paul’s motion to compel is granted.
II. BACKGROUND 1
St. Paul is a Minnesota corporation with…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- International Shoe Co. v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Burger King Corp. v. RudzewiczSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- World-Wide Volkswagen Corp. v. WoodsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Hanson v. DencklaSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Insurance Corp. of Ireland v. Compagnie Des Bauxites De GuineeSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- A. David Ostrem, Sr. v. Prideco Secure Loan Fund, LpSupreme Court of Iowa · 2014
- Airtel Wireless, LLC v. Montana Electronics Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2005
- Federated Mutual Insurance Company v. Federated National Holding Company, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2018
- SFC Global Supply Chain, Inc. v. DNO, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2021